This is a key point. What, however, does not necessarily follow from his
own argument is his view that on the basis of postulating the non-identical or the
anti-identical one can reach a ‘‘rational identity’’ that provides a basis for
liberation from the abstraction of exchange as the fundamental evil of capitalism
and of administrative thinking (Adorno 149–50). One could understand that he
hopes for a productive and positive effect arising from contradiction. That may
well be the case. And yet the concept of identity that Adorno has in fact already
destroyed remains the starting point for what is to be overcome, and thus
the idea of emancipation on the path of the non-identical or the anti-identical
is at most another form of ideology and not its desired abolition. One cannot destroy
something with the very tools one used to make it great and mighty in the first place.
ประโยคสุดท้าย ที่ขีดเส้นใต้ครับ ทีเหลือให้มาเป็นบริบท
แปลประโยคนี้ไม่ได้ รบกวนด้วยครับ
own argument is his view that on the basis of postulating the non-identical or the
anti-identical one can reach a ‘‘rational identity’’ that provides a basis for
liberation from the abstraction of exchange as the fundamental evil of capitalism
and of administrative thinking (Adorno 149–50). One could understand that he
hopes for a productive and positive effect arising from contradiction. That may
well be the case. And yet the concept of identity that Adorno has in fact already
destroyed remains the starting point for what is to be overcome, and thus
the idea of emancipation on the path of the non-identical or the anti-identical
is at most another form of ideology and not its desired abolition. One cannot destroy
something with the very tools one used to make it great and mighty in the first place.
ประโยคสุดท้าย ที่ขีดเส้นใต้ครับ ทีเหลือให้มาเป็นบริบท