คือว่ามาเรียนอาร์ต แต่ไม่ได้สอบไอเอล เลยเลือกเรียน foundation แทนค่ะ
มันยากมากๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆสำหรับคนที่เรียน 4ปี ในมหาวิทยาลัยไม่มีวิชาภาษาอังกฤษเลย
รบกวนพี่น้องจิ้มๆ grammar ที่มันผิดแบบไม่น่าให้อภัยหน่อยนะคะ
ขอบคุณล่วงหน้าเป็นเป็นอย่างสูงส่ง
Assignment two
Compare the UN and Arnett’s perspective on what constitutes the “global culture” and what role the media plays
Globalization has increased its intensity in the past decades. One major reason that accelerates the growth is the advancement of communication technologies. These technologies are rendering a mobility and exchange of people, goods, capitals and ideas throughout the world. The interactions lead to cultural integration and therefore create global culture. Young people are a group that most exposed to and effected by global culture. Global media plays crucial role in facilitating global culture’s dissemination which link young people world wild to the same ideas and values.
Two texts (Young people in a Globalizing World”, UN (2003) and (“The Psychology of Globalization”, Arnett (2002) discuss what constitutes the global culture and what role the media plays from different perspectives. The UN (2003) predominantly argues the ambiguous effects of globalization on young people. These effects, in the UN’s point of view, are overall negative. The UN points out that global culture is a consumer culture that mostly attracts young people. The UN also claims that global culture can have adverse effects on young people who have limited access. The UN further discusses that this lack of opportunities may create a sense of social exclusion and experience conflicts. Whereas the UN focuses about the struggles, Arnett analyses the effects of global culture in a positive way. Although Arnett concedes that global culture creates some confusion, he argues that most young people willingly embrace global culture which implies to great opportunities and more choices.
Even though the above two texts have distinctive contrasting views, they seem to agree to some extent. First, both argue that global culture is market driven by Multinational companies which are mostly western agencies. They target particular young people as they are in a stage of transition and therefore vulnerable to external influences. There is a consensus from both texts that global mass media playing a vital role in creating of these cultures and most of young people want to engage with global culture. Last, both texts agree that youth are not only participate as passive receivers but also react and adopt global culture. Although they acknowledge these interactions, they argues the impacts of global culture differently.
Arnett argues that global and local cultures harmoniously coexist. Young people can participate with both cultures without or little conflicts. Even though Arnett (2002:pp21-24) concedes that local culture has been affected by global culture, these impacts are not destructive. On the other hand, the UN (2003) contradicts Arnett’s statement that global influences “[which is] the cultural dominance of the west (9)” is more powerful than local culture. These multinational corporations create universal consumer culture by global products, therefore, fail to acknowledge cultural diversity. On the contrary, Arnett (2002:17) discounts that the idea of uniform culture is far from being one homogeneous. Cultural diversity will continue to exist because more young people will develop bicultural identity and some will join a self-selected culture (26). While Arnett (2002:17,30) insists that interactions between global and local culture lead to more cultural diversity, the UN asserts that local culture is one directional influenced. Furthermore, the UN (2003:7, 11) claims that global culture is exclusionary ideology because not all young people have the same abilities, opportunities and financial resources to participate with global culture. These values reinforce a divide of inequality and therefore vast majority of young people who unable to possess these value are excluded (pp.5-7). While Arnett seems to acknowledge that global culture is market driven by consumer culture. He minimizes negative impacts of consumerism, emphasizes the value of global culture as having a choice and freedom to choose (26). Arnett (2002:22) contradicts UN’s statements that global culture provides a sense of belonging or inclusion by embracing global consciousness. Therefore, these values enable young people become parts of global culture without financial resources.
Both texts agree that media plays key role in promoting values of global culture. In other word, global culture cannot exist without global media. The UN (2003:9) claims that the global media is owned and controlled by western agencies which spread the idea of “American centric vision (9)” and undermine local media industry. The UN (2003:11) asserts that advertising agencies are extremely persuasive and try to have effects on young people. Furthermore, global media also reflects contradiction between the idea of liberation and alienation. While borderless media technology seems to liberate young ones from geographic boundary but it actually isolate them because their creation of individualistic world (12). Therefore, the alienation strengthens more divisions. However, the UN (2003:11) advises that youth in developed country can contribute to and adopt from global culture to some extent. Whereas Arnett(2002:pp.19-20) recognizes that some young people undergo problems due to their contact with global culture through global media, most youth desire to connect to global culture. The media technology allows young people to directly communicate worldwide and be aware of world affairs that are part of the global culture. Therefore, global media gives young people a sense of acceptance and does not alienate young people as the UN claims.
ยังไม่เขียนสรุปค่ะ
เด็กศิลป์ รบกวนพี่น้องตรวจแกรมมาหน่อยคะ ถ้าไม่ผ่านจะไม่ได้เรียนต่อ(สักที)
มันยากมากๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆๆสำหรับคนที่เรียน 4ปี ในมหาวิทยาลัยไม่มีวิชาภาษาอังกฤษเลย
รบกวนพี่น้องจิ้มๆ grammar ที่มันผิดแบบไม่น่าให้อภัยหน่อยนะคะ
ขอบคุณล่วงหน้าเป็นเป็นอย่างสูงส่ง
Assignment two
Compare the UN and Arnett’s perspective on what constitutes the “global culture” and what role the media plays
Globalization has increased its intensity in the past decades. One major reason that accelerates the growth is the advancement of communication technologies. These technologies are rendering a mobility and exchange of people, goods, capitals and ideas throughout the world. The interactions lead to cultural integration and therefore create global culture. Young people are a group that most exposed to and effected by global culture. Global media plays crucial role in facilitating global culture’s dissemination which link young people world wild to the same ideas and values.
Two texts (Young people in a Globalizing World”, UN (2003) and (“The Psychology of Globalization”, Arnett (2002) discuss what constitutes the global culture and what role the media plays from different perspectives. The UN (2003) predominantly argues the ambiguous effects of globalization on young people. These effects, in the UN’s point of view, are overall negative. The UN points out that global culture is a consumer culture that mostly attracts young people. The UN also claims that global culture can have adverse effects on young people who have limited access. The UN further discusses that this lack of opportunities may create a sense of social exclusion and experience conflicts. Whereas the UN focuses about the struggles, Arnett analyses the effects of global culture in a positive way. Although Arnett concedes that global culture creates some confusion, he argues that most young people willingly embrace global culture which implies to great opportunities and more choices.
Even though the above two texts have distinctive contrasting views, they seem to agree to some extent. First, both argue that global culture is market driven by Multinational companies which are mostly western agencies. They target particular young people as they are in a stage of transition and therefore vulnerable to external influences. There is a consensus from both texts that global mass media playing a vital role in creating of these cultures and most of young people want to engage with global culture. Last, both texts agree that youth are not only participate as passive receivers but also react and adopt global culture. Although they acknowledge these interactions, they argues the impacts of global culture differently.
Arnett argues that global and local cultures harmoniously coexist. Young people can participate with both cultures without or little conflicts. Even though Arnett (2002:pp21-24) concedes that local culture has been affected by global culture, these impacts are not destructive. On the other hand, the UN (2003) contradicts Arnett’s statement that global influences “[which is] the cultural dominance of the west (9)” is more powerful than local culture. These multinational corporations create universal consumer culture by global products, therefore, fail to acknowledge cultural diversity. On the contrary, Arnett (2002:17) discounts that the idea of uniform culture is far from being one homogeneous. Cultural diversity will continue to exist because more young people will develop bicultural identity and some will join a self-selected culture (26). While Arnett (2002:17,30) insists that interactions between global and local culture lead to more cultural diversity, the UN asserts that local culture is one directional influenced. Furthermore, the UN (2003:7, 11) claims that global culture is exclusionary ideology because not all young people have the same abilities, opportunities and financial resources to participate with global culture. These values reinforce a divide of inequality and therefore vast majority of young people who unable to possess these value are excluded (pp.5-7). While Arnett seems to acknowledge that global culture is market driven by consumer culture. He minimizes negative impacts of consumerism, emphasizes the value of global culture as having a choice and freedom to choose (26). Arnett (2002:22) contradicts UN’s statements that global culture provides a sense of belonging or inclusion by embracing global consciousness. Therefore, these values enable young people become parts of global culture without financial resources.
Both texts agree that media plays key role in promoting values of global culture. In other word, global culture cannot exist without global media. The UN (2003:9) claims that the global media is owned and controlled by western agencies which spread the idea of “American centric vision (9)” and undermine local media industry. The UN (2003:11) asserts that advertising agencies are extremely persuasive and try to have effects on young people. Furthermore, global media also reflects contradiction between the idea of liberation and alienation. While borderless media technology seems to liberate young ones from geographic boundary but it actually isolate them because their creation of individualistic world (12). Therefore, the alienation strengthens more divisions. However, the UN (2003:11) advises that youth in developed country can contribute to and adopt from global culture to some extent. Whereas Arnett(2002:pp.19-20) recognizes that some young people undergo problems due to their contact with global culture through global media, most youth desire to connect to global culture. The media technology allows young people to directly communicate worldwide and be aware of world affairs that are part of the global culture. Therefore, global media gives young people a sense of acceptance and does not alienate young people as the UN claims.
ยังไม่เขียนสรุปค่ะ