---

บริษัทร้าง (Dormant Company) คือ นิติบุคคลที่จดทะเบียนแล้วแต่ ไม่ได้ประกอบกิจการ หรือ ไม่ยื่นงบการเงินติดต่อกันเกิน 3 ปี หรือ จดทะเบียนเลิกแต่ไม่เสร็จสิ้นการชำระบัญชีภายใน 3 ปี ทำให้ถูกนายทะเบียนขีดชื่อออกจากทะเบียนและสิ้นสภาพนิติบุคคล แต่กรรมการและผู้ถือหุ้นยังคงมีความรับผิดชอบหนี้สินอยู่ และ ไม่สามารถทำนิติกรรมใดๆ ได้ การจะกลับมาทำธุรกิจได้ต้องยื่นคำร้องต่อศาลเพื่อขอให้จดชื่อกลับเข้าสู่ทะเบียนก่อน

https://www.prosoftibiz.com/Article/Detail/118021

---

[Spoil] คลิกเพื่อดูข้อความที่ซ่อนไว้EP.4 - The Role of Shell Companies in Money Laundering and Financial Crimes

Introduction

Shell companies are legal entities that exist primarily on paper, with little to no significant business operations or assets. While shell companies have legitimate uses, they are also widely exploited for illicit financial activities, including money laundering, fraud, tax evasion, and terrorist financing. Criminals often use these entities to hide the origins of illicit funds, transfer wealth across borders, and obscure the true ownership of assets.

Given Thailand’s position as a major trade and financial hub in Southeast Asia, authorities have intensified efforts to combat the misuse of shell companies. Understanding how these entities function, their risks, and the evolving regulatory landscape is crucial for financial institutions and businesses seeking to ensure compliance with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) regulations.

What Are Shell Companies?

Definition and Characteristics

A shell company is a business entity that has no physical presence, employees, or active operations but exists primarily to hold assets, manage financial transactions, or serve as an intermediary in business deals. While not inherently illegal, shell companies can be used to conceal financial activities, evade taxes, and facilitate money laundering (FATF 2023).

Key characteristics of shell companies include:

•No significant operations – They do not manufacture goods, provide services, or employ workers.
•Minimal public records – Owners and directors often remain anonymous or use nominee shareholders.
•Incorporation in secrecy jurisdictions – Many shell companies are registered in offshore locations known for lax regulatory oversight (e.g., British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands).
•Frequent fund transfers – Used for complex financial transactions that make it difficult to trace the origins of funds (OECD 2023).

Shell Companies vs. Shelf Companies

It is important to distinguish shell companies from shelf companies:

•Shell companies have no legitimate business purpose and often exist to facilitate financial crime.
•Shelf companies are pre-registered entities available for purchase, allowing businesses to acquire a legally established company with a clean history to facilitate immediate operations (World Bank 2023).

How Shell Companies Facilitate Money Laundering

1. Layering Illicit Funds

Money laundering typically occurs in three stages: placement, layering, and integration. Shell companies play a critical role in the layering process, where illicit funds are moved through multiple transactions to obscure their origin. Criminals often transfer money between shell companies across different jurisdictions to make tracing difficult (IMF 2023).

2. Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML)

Shell companies are frequently used in Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML) schemes, where goods and services are over-invoiced or under-invoiced to justify financial transactions. This technique allows criminals to move illicit money across borders under the guise of legitimate trade transactions (FATF 2023).

3. Tax Evasion and Offshore Banking

Shell companies allow individuals and corporations to evade taxes by shifting profits to low-tax jurisdictions. By routing funds through offshore shell entities, businesses can avoid paying corporate taxes in their home countries. This practice, while sometimes legal, is heavily scrutinized by tax authorities (OECD 2023).

4. Concealing Beneficial Ownership

Many criminals use shell companies to hide the true ownership of assets, such as real estate, yachts, and bank accounts. By using nominee directors or trust structures, criminals can keep their names off official records, making it difficult for regulators to identify the real beneficiaries (World Bank 2023).

5. Facilitating Bribery and Corruption

Government officials and corporate executives have used shell companies to receive and distribute bribes while maintaining anonymity. Funds can be funneled through layers of shell companies to make corruption payments difficult to trace (Transparency International 2023).

Notable Cases of Shell Company Abuse

1. The Panama Papers Leak (2016)

The Panama Papers leak exposed over 200,000 shell companies used by politicians, business leaders, and criminals to hide wealth, evade taxes, and launder money. The revelations led to international regulatory reforms and increased scrutiny of offshore financial structures (ICIJ 2023).

2. The 1MDB Scandal (Malaysia)

The 1MDB scandal involved Malaysian officials and business executives laundering billions of dollars through a network of shell companies in offshore jurisdictions. These funds were used for luxury purchases, real estate, and political bribery, highlighting the dangers of weak regulatory oversight (IMF 2023).

3. Thai Real Estate Market and Money Laundering

Thailand’s real estate sector has been flagged for potential misuse by foreign nationals using shell companies to purchase high-value properties. Authorities have increased scrutiny on foreign direct investments and cash purchases of real estate linked to unverified shell entities (AMLO 2023).

Regulatory Measures to Combat Shell Company Abuse

1. Beneficial Ownership Transparency Laws

Governments worldwide, including Thailand, have strengthened laws requiring the disclosure of beneficial ownership of companies. The goal is to prevent criminals from hiding behind anonymous corporate structures (Bank of Thailand 2023).

2. Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations

The FATF has issued guidelines urging financial institutions to conduct Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) on entities that show signs of being shell companies. Institutions must verify the legitimacy of a business before engaging in transactions (FATF 2023).

3. Thailand’s Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) Regulations

AMLO has implemented policies requiring Thai banks and financial institutions to scrutinize corporate structures and report suspicious transactions linked to shell entities. Regulators now focus on identifying high-risk businesses with no operational presence (AMLO 2023).

4. OECD’s Global Crackdown on Tax Havens

The OECD has led international efforts to reduce tax evasion through shell companies, encouraging jurisdictions to adopt the Common Reporting Standard (CRS) for cross-border financial transparency (OECD 2023).

Best Practices for Businesses and Financial Institutions

To mitigate risks associated with shell companies, businesses and financial institutions should implement the following compliance measures:

1.Know Your Customer (KYC) Protocols
•Conduct thorough identity verification of corporate clients and their ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs) (Bank of Thailand 2023).
2.Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) on High-Risk Entities
•Investigate companies that exhibit red flags, such as lack of physical presence, nominee shareholders, and frequent cross-border transactions (FATF 2023).
3.Continuous Transaction Monitoring
•Implement AI-driven monitoring systems to detect unusual financial patterns linked to shell entities (OECD 2023).
4.Strengthened Reporting Obligations
•Financial institutions must promptly report suspicious activities to AMLO and international regulato[