คำตอบที่ได้รับเลือกจากเจ้าของกระทู้
ความคิดเห็นที่ 2
เท่าที่สืบค้นมาต้นฉบับนั้นมาจากนายพล Kurt von Hammerstein-Equord
I distinguish four types. There are clever, hardworking, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and hardworking; their place is the General Staff. The next ones are stupid and lazy; they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the mental clarity and strength of nerve necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is both stupid and hardworking; he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always only cause damage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_von_Hammerstein-Equord#Classification_of_officers
I distinguish four types. There are clever, hardworking, stupid, and lazy officers. Usually two characteristics are combined. Some are clever and hardworking; their place is the General Staff. The next ones are stupid and lazy; they make up 90 percent of every army and are suited to routine duties. Anyone who is both clever and lazy is qualified for the highest leadership duties, because he possesses the mental clarity and strength of nerve necessary for difficult decisions. One must beware of anyone who is both stupid and hardworking; he must not be entrusted with any responsibility because he will always only cause damage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kurt_von_Hammerstein-Equord#Classification_of_officers
แสดงความคิดเห็น
ประโยคที่ว่า โง่แต่ขยันให้เอาไปฆ่าทิ้ง เพราะจะขยันทำแต่เรื่งอโง่ๆ ใครพูดเหรอครับ