คำตอบที่ได้รับเลือกจากเจ้าของกระทู้
ความคิดเห็นที่ 5
http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/03/economist-explains-why-south-africa-brics
There was just one problem with the BRICs: no African countries were included. This was a little embarrassing. Overlooking Africa suggested that the continent was an economic irrelevance, good only for providing raw materials to the rest. It also cast doubt on the group’s claim to speak for the emerging world. Two African countries might have been candidates, Nigeria and South Africa. But only one would keep the acronym intact. And so, in 2010, the club of BRICs became the BRICS.
There was just one problem with the BRICs: no African countries were included. This was a little embarrassing. Overlooking Africa suggested that the continent was an economic irrelevance, good only for providing raw materials to the rest. It also cast doubt on the group’s claim to speak for the emerging world. Two African countries might have been candidates, Nigeria and South Africa. But only one would keep the acronym intact. And so, in 2010, the club of BRICs became the BRICS.
แสดงความคิดเห็น
ทำไมประเทศแอฟริกาใต้ถึงได้อยู่ในกลุ่ม BRICS
ถ้าเป็นแค่ BRIC เฉยๆจะทำให้อำนาจต่อลองใดๆลดลงหรือเปล่าครับ?