มันใกล้จบแล้วคร้บนาย ...
เหตุผลที่จะใช้ Fool Frame แทบไม่เหลือแล้ว จากข้อสรุปของ
ตากล้องของมาเลเซีย (เป็นประธานกรรมการการตัดสิน ชิงรางวัลถ่ายภาพ
แห่ง ASEAN ชิงเงินรางวัลรวม US$35,000 ดูรายละเอียดได้ใน link ข้างล่างสุด)
http://blog.mingthein.com/2013/09/11/the-2013-olympus-om-d-e-m1-review-2/
เขาสรุปดังนี้
And here we come full circle: I compare the E-M1 to the D600 because it’s the cheapest entry into full frame (and I didn’t have access to a pro DX camera; in any case, none of the current lineup match it on spec either) – and whilst the D600 still holds a bit of an advantage in image quality, it’s not as much as you might think; less in practical application; far more of the difference will come down to shot discipline and how the images are processed. And that’s assuming pixels are going to be peeped: they’re close enough that even at 100% it takes a reasonably trained eye to spot the difference. Everybody will see the composition first, of course. Even if we’d had DX cameras in the mix, the results would be even closer still – if not an even match. Even as it stands, I haven’t observed that much difference in underlying sensor quality between the GR and OM-D; at stop, at most. Most of the difference is due to the optics. espite its sensor, the D600 lags behind in every other specification; it’s not until you hit the full-fat D4 that you can match frame rates or environmental sealing.
Bottom line: there is simply nothing quite like the E-M1 at the moment – a very compact professional system camera.
]
+++ Olympus OM-D EM-1 ... "Fool" Frame Killer +++
เหตุผลที่จะใช้ Fool Frame แทบไม่เหลือแล้ว จากข้อสรุปของ
ตากล้องของมาเลเซีย (เป็นประธานกรรมการการตัดสิน ชิงรางวัลถ่ายภาพ
แห่ง ASEAN ชิงเงินรางวัลรวม US$35,000 ดูรายละเอียดได้ใน link ข้างล่างสุด)
http://blog.mingthein.com/2013/09/11/the-2013-olympus-om-d-e-m1-review-2/
เขาสรุปดังนี้
And here we come full circle: I compare the E-M1 to the D600 because it’s the cheapest entry into full frame (and I didn’t have access to a pro DX camera; in any case, none of the current lineup match it on spec either) – and whilst the D600 still holds a bit of an advantage in image quality, it’s not as much as you might think; less in practical application; far more of the difference will come down to shot discipline and how the images are processed. And that’s assuming pixels are going to be peeped: they’re close enough that even at 100% it takes a reasonably trained eye to spot the difference. Everybody will see the composition first, of course. Even if we’d had DX cameras in the mix, the results would be even closer still – if not an even match. Even as it stands, I haven’t observed that much difference in underlying sensor quality between the GR and OM-D; at stop, at most. Most of the difference is due to the optics. espite its sensor, the D600 lags behind in every other specification; it’s not until you hit the full-fat D4 that you can match frame rates or environmental sealing. Bottom line: there is simply nothing quite like the E-M1 at the moment – a very compact professional system camera.
]